郭 璇

• 1:华中科技大学图书馆 武汉 430074

摘要(Abstract)：

[目的/意义]系统解析2013-2023年国外图书馆学博士学位论文研究特征，为我国学科创新发展提供方法论参考。[方法/过程]采用内容分析法对国外图情领域博士学位论文进行历时性考察，从研究主题、方法演进及范式转型三个维度构建分析框架。[结果/结论]研究主题呈现“核心稳定-边界延展”的双重特征：在保持图书馆管理与建设、用户信息行为与服务优化等传统优势的同时，向数字人文、开放科学等新兴领域延伸，形成技术驱动与学科融合的演进路径。研究方法形成“质性主导-技术赋能”路径：定性分析保持基础地位，计算机技术、社会网络分析与心理实证方法协同推动跨学科范式转型。国外学科发展遵循“价值传承-技术革新”的演进逻辑，建议国内研究重点构建智能技术应用与混合方法体系，强化信息公平治理研究，助力国家文化数字化战略实施。

关键词(KeyWords)： 图书馆学 学位论文 研究主题 研究方法

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation):

作者(Author): 郭 璇

参考文献(References)：

• [1]杨国立,刘竟,汪满容,等. 欧美图书馆学博士学位论文研究主题图谱分析[J].中国图书馆学报, 2015,41(4):96-111.(YANG G L, LIU J, WANG M R, et al. Research theme mapping analysis of library science doctoral dissertations in Europe and America[J]. Journal of Library Science in China, 2015, 41(4): 96-111.)
• [2]叶莎莎. 国外图书馆学博士学位论文的统计分析(2000—2012)[J]. 新世纪图书馆,2013(1):84-88.(YE S S. Statistical analysis of foreign library science doctoral dissertations (2000–2012) [J]. New Century Library, 2013(1): 84-88.)
• [3]刘竟, 田丽丽, 苏文成. 欧美图书馆学博士学位论文研究方法分析[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2015(18): 2-8,43.
• (LIU J, TIAN L L, SU W C. Analysis of research methods in European and American library science doctoral dissertations[J]. Library Science Research, 2015(18): 2-8,43.)
• [4]梁桂英, 刘竟, 朱安青, 等. 美国图书馆学博士学位论文的引文分析——以伊利诺伊大学厄巴纳-香槟分校为例[J]. 情报杂志, 2016, 35(12):181-185.(LIANG G Y, LIU J, ZHU A Q, et al. Citation analysis of library science doctoral dissertations in the United States: A case study of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2016, 35(12):181-185.)
• [5]杨志刚,刘竟,张新兴. 欧美图书馆学博士学位论文时间分布、授予机构与学位类型分析[J]. 图书馆, 2016(7):73-78.(YANG Z G, LIU J, ZHANG X X. Temporal distribution, granting institutions, and degree types of library science doctoral dissertations in Europe and America[J]. Library,2016(7):73-78.)
• [6]卢泰宏. 信息分析[M]. 广州:中山大学出版社,1998.(LU T H. Information analysis. Guangzhou: Sun Yat-sen University Press, 1998.)
• [7] MA J, LUND B. The evolution and shift of research topics and methods in library and information science[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2021, 72(8): 1059-1074.
• [8] JARVELIN K. LIS research across 50 years: Content analysis of journal articles[J]. Journal of Documentation, 2021, 78(7): 65-88.
• [9]张雪梅. 我国图书馆学研究的主题分类表构建及主题分布规律研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2018: 69-71.(ZHANG X M. Construction of a thematic classification system and analysis of thematic distribution in library science research in China[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2018: 69-71.)
• [10]于良芝. 图书馆学导论[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2003: 139-144.(YU L Z. Introduction to library science[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2003: 139-144.)
• [11]MOED H F, et al. Handbook of quantitative science and technology research[M]. Heidelberg: Springer, 2005.
• [12]杨小微. 教育研究方法[M]. 北京:人民教育出版社,2005:98.(YANG X W. Educational research methods[M]. Beijing: People’s Education Press, 2005: 98.)
• [13]LANDIS J R, KOCH G G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data[J]. Biometrics, 1977, 33(1): 159-174.
• [14]闫婧. 网络社会与国家——曼纽尔·卡斯特“网络社会”理论探究[J]. 国外社会科学前沿, 2019(11): 15-21.83.(YAN J. Cyberspace and the state: A study of Manuel Castells’ theory of “network society” [J]. Frontiers of Foreign Social Sciences, 2019(11): 15-21,83.)
• [15]杨国立, 袁润, 张垒. 转型期高校和研究机构图书馆员能力建设[J]. 情报资料工作, 2016(4): 92-97.
• (YANG G L, YUAN R, ZHANG L. Capacity building of librarians in universities and research institutions during the transitional period[J]. Information and Documentation Work, 2016(4): 92-97.)
• [16] HEVERIN T. Information behaviors and cognitive modes used for cyber situation assessment[D]. Chicago: Dominican University, 2014.
• [17]黄晓斌, 张明鑫. 国外图书情报领域质性研究方法应用分析及启示——以JASIS&T（1998-2018）论文为例[J]. 情报科学,2021,39(2):96-105.(HUANG X B, ZHANG M X. Analysis and insights on the application of qualitative research methods in foreign library and information science: A case study of JASIS&T (1998–2018) [J]. Information Science, 2021, 39(2): 96-105.)
• [18]OLORUNFEMI T. The veteran, library, tasks and tools (VLTT) framework: An analysis of disabled veterans, information tasks, and assistive tools in libraries[D]. River Forest: Dominican University, 2017.
• [19]MAHLAHL A A. Academic library experiences of Muslim Arabic-speaking women international students (MASWIS) in the United States[D]. River Forest: Dominican University, 2020.
• [20]林荣全. 公共服务包容性发展的创新逻辑——基于全球60个典型案例的分析[J]. 东北大学学报(社会科学版),2023,25(4):89-96,150.(LIN R Q. Innovative logic of inclusive development in public services: Analysis based on 60 global typical cases[J]. Journal of Northeastern University (Social Science Edition), 2023, 25(4):89-96,150.)
• [21]叶靓俏,尹彩春,赵文武. 基于文献计量分析的联合国可持续发展目标研究[J]. 生态学报,2023,43(24): 10480-10489.(YE L Q, YIN C C, ZHAO W W. Research on the United Nations sustainable development goals: A bibliometric analysis[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43(24):10480-10489.)
• [22]徐畅, 凌静, 曹国如. 美国杨百翰大学图书馆跨学科教研服务实践及启示[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2022(4): 86-93.(XU C, LING J, CAO G R. Practices and implications of interdisciplinary teaching-research services at Brigham Young University Library in the United States[J]. Library Science Research, 2022(4): 86-93.)