图书情报研究

参考已有的相关研究,建立由五个一级指标(期刊规模、期刊学术含量、被引情况、H指数、影响因子)和若干二级指标构成的期刊学术影响力评价指标体系。利用《中国引文数据库》中的期刊分析器、著者分析器、机构分析器等多种工具2011~2015年的统计数据,对《情报理论与实践》、《情报杂志》、《情报科学》三种情报学核心期刊进行全面比较和分析,以期客观展示这三种期刊近五年的发展变化情况及其学术影响力。分析结果表明,近五年来,这三种期刊规模都相对稳定,吸收文献的能力、受关注程度和论文引用速率均在提升,且多以985、211院校为主要发文机构。《情报杂志》多项指标优势明显,仅即年指标和著者构成有待提高和完善;《情报理论与实践》在基金论文比和即年指标方面占有优势,其余多项指标值处于落后状态,有待加强;《情报科学》多项指标值居中,与《情报理论与实践》的部分指标相似,两者实力相当,完善著者构成将更有助于该期刊的可持续发展。

Referring to related research, this article sets up an evaluation system of journal academic influence, including five primary indicators(journal size, journal academic content, cited status, H index and impact factor) and several secondary indicators. Using the statistical data from 2011 to 2015 from journal analyzer, author analyzer, institution analyzer, and other tools in Chinese Citation Database, comprehensively compare and analyze the three core journals of information science Information Studies: Theory & Application, Journal of Intelligence and Information Science, in order to objectively demonstrate their development and changes and academic influence in recent five years. Research results show that their journal sizes are all stable the literature absorption capacity, attention degree and citation rate of the these three journals are all increasing, and their articles mostly come from Project 985 or 211 universities.Journal of Intelligence has obvious advantages in several indicators, only the immediacy index and author constitution index need to be improved and perfected. Information Studies: Theory & Application is good at the fund papers and immediacy index, but other indicators are in a backward state and need to be strengthened. Information Science is second in a number of indicators and has some similar indicators with Information Studies:Theory & Application, and perfect its author constitution will further contribute to its sustainable development.